Over the past five decades or so three theories have been brought together in a catch-as-catch-can manner, known as the “standard model” of particle physics. Despite the fact that this model on close examination appears to be held together by spit and chewing gum, it turns out that until recently, it was the most accurate basic picture of how matter works that had ever been devised.
The “standard
model” proved its worth in 2012 with the discovery of Higgs boson, the
particle that gives all other fundamental particles their mass, whose existence
was predicted on the basis of quantum field theories as far back as 1964.
Conventional
quantum field theories work well in describing the results of experiments at
high-energy particle smashers such as CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, where
the Higgs was discovered, which probe matter at its smallest scales. (CERN
is the world’s largest particle physics laboratory—an international
scientific collaboration without parallel in its scale and ambition—located on the
border between Switzerland and France.)
CERN was established
by international convention in the aftermath of the second world war by the
European Council for Nuclear Research and was originally intended to foster
collaborative research into fundamental physics for peaceable purposes. Today,
some 12,000 researchers from across the globe use its facilities each year, and
it has been the scene of seminal scientific and technological breakthroughs—notably
the World Wide Web, invented in 1989 within its doors to allow particle physicists
to exchange data across borders.
In spite of these
great scientific breakthroughs using quantum physics, there are some lesser
problems that still remain insoluble—e.g., how electrons move or do not move
through a solid material and so make a material a metal, an insulator, or a
semiconductor.
The multiplied
billions of interactions in these crowded environments require the development
of what are called “effective field theories” that gloss over some of the gory
details. The challenge quantum physicists face in constructing such theories explains
why many important questions in solid-state physics remain unresolved—e.g., why
at low temperatures some materials are superconductors that allow current
without electrical resistance, and why scientists cannot find a way to get this
to work at room temperature.
Beyond these
practical problems lies a huge quantum mystery. At a basic level, quantum
physics predicts very strange things about how matter works that are completely
at odds with how things seem to work in the “apparent world.”
For example, quantum
particles have the capacity to behave like particles that are located in a
single place; or they can act like waves, distributed all over space or in
several places. How they appear seems to depend on how scientists choose to
measure them, and before they are measured, they seem to have no definite
properties at all. This leads to a fundamental insoluble problem related to the
nature of basic reality itself.
One example of this
is the paradox of Schrödinger’s cat, in which, thanks to an uncertain quantum
process, a cat is left dead and alive at the same time. Quantum particles also
seem to be able to affect each other instantaneously even when they are far
away from each other. This is called entanglement or, in a phrase
coined by Einstein, who contributed to, but was quite critical of quantum
theory, “spooky actions at a distance.”
Even though these
quantum powers are by no means completely understood, yet they are in fact the
basis of emerging technologies such as ultra-secure quantum cryptography and
ultra-powerful quan-tum computing.
No comments:
Post a Comment